Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (1990)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided May 14, 1990Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Senate Haney,

¶ 0 The Attorney General has received your letter asking for an official opinion addressing, in effect, the following questions:

1. Has the Oklahoma Center for the Advancement of Science andTechnology (OCAST) been authorized by the requisite 2/3 votemandated by Okla. Const. Article X, Section 15, to use the SeedCapital Revolving Fund created pursuant to 74 O.S. 5060.21(1989)?

2. Assuming that OCAST may use the Seed-Capital Revolving Fund,may it contract with a private investment fund manager to make"seed-capital" investments?

I

¶ 1 Pursuant to 74 O.S. 5060.21 (1989), the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. American Federation of Labor-Congress of Industrial Organizations v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Commissioners' Court of El Paso County v. El Paso County Sheriff's Deputies Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Ward v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. UHLER Et Al. v. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR-CONGRESS OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATIONS Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API