Legal Opinion

Singer Manufacturing Co. v. Gray

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1897PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Civil action tried before Mclver, J., and a jury at March Term, 1897, of Jokes Superior Court. The facts appear in the opinion. There was a verdict for the defendant and from thé judgment thereon the plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Furches, J.:

The plaintiff, through its agent Brown, delivered to the defendant a sewing machine, under a written contract, which plaintiff calls a lease on the instalment plan — so much to be paid at the time of delivery and then an agreed sum per month, until the estimated price should be paid. 'When the defendant had paid $25 on this machine, but was behind with some of his monthly instalments, the enterprising agent of the plaintiff took this machine from defendant, but graciously agreed to let the defendant have another machine, estimated to be worth $45 at the price of $55, upon the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crinkley v. EgertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  2. A. D. Puffer & Sons Manufacturing Co. v. LucasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  3. Clark Bros. v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Yarborough v. Hughes.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Hamilton v. . HighlandsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. John Hetherington & Sons, Ltd. v. RudisillCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928
  4. Wilcox Bros. v. CherrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  5. Puffer v. . LucasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API