In Re Proceedings for the Disbarment of Gwynn

(dissenting) — The offenses of which the attorney was charged for misuse of funds of cer tain of Ms clients were no graver than those in In re Penland, 152 Wash. 427, 277 Pac. 1119, where the former board of law examiners recommended suspension for a period of one year, wMeh this court affirmed. Nor are they any more serious or grave than those considered in In re Sampley, 160 Wash. 92, 294 Pac. 1118, in which case two members of the board of bar examiners recommended permanent disbarment and one member recommended suspension for a year. After considering the evidence in the case, we held…