Legal Opinion

Garcia Fleet Corp. v. Martinez

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 18, 1986No. 85-1739PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We agree with the appellants that the trial court erred in imposing the extreme sanctions of striking their pleadings and entering a default and, subsequently, entering an order freezing their assets for failure to make discovery. It is undisputed on this record that, when the trial court granted the appellants’ motion for protective order, Rene and Nicolas Garcia were on the high seas and unavailable to be renoticed for their depositions. The Garci-as did not have the ability to comply with the discovery orders, see Grapin & Chaykin, M.D., P.A. v. Turnoff & Fox, M.D., P.A., 416 So.2d 843…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Santuoso v. McGrath & Associates, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  2. SUMMIT CHASE COND. ASSOC., INC. v. Protean Investors, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. BEAVER CRANE SERV. v. National Surety Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  4. Grapin & Chaykin, M.D., P.A. v. Turnoff & Fox, M.D., P.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Beauchamp v. CollinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  2. Gomez-Bonilla v. Apollo Ship Chandlers, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API