Legal Opinion

Newman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 30, 1992No. 92-2219PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

610 So.2d 455 (1992)

Phillip NEWMAN, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 92-2219.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

September 30, 1992.

Phillip Newman, pro se appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

2Per curiam

Appellant filed a motion seeking gain-time, along with a petition in support of his motion. When his motion was denied he moved for rehearing of his motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We can assume from the motion for rehearing that the original motion was also filed pursuant to rule 3.800(a). We agree with the First District Court of…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Griffis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Frow v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mathis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  2. Kosek v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Campbell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  4. Wright v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  5. Mathis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API