Legal Opinion

(HC) Scott v. Fox

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 19, 2019No. 2:18-cv-02687Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL LADONTE SCOTT, No. 2:18-cv-2687 TLN KJN P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 ROBERT W. FOX, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding in forma pauperis and without counsel. Petitioner 18 seeks the appointment of counsel, and filed a motion for an expedited hearing or preliminary 19 relief. 20 Initially, petitioner is advised that respondent has not yet filed a responsive pleading. It 21 would be inappropriate for the court to hold a hearing until the petition is fully briefed.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Ross v. BlakeSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API