Legal Opinion

Minnesota Fire & Casualty Co. v. Greenfield

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 9, 2002Published

1Opinion of the Court

805 A.2d 622 (2002)

MINNESOTA FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant,

v.

Michael GREENFIELD, et al. Appellee.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued February 13, 2002.

Filed August 9, 2002.

William T. Salzer, Philadelphia, for appellant.

Mark K. Emery, Mechanicsburg, for appellee.

Before: ORIE MELVIN, KLEIN and OLSZEWSKI, JJ.

KLEIN, J.

¶ 1 Appellant Minnesota Fire and Casualty Company ("Minnesota"), in this declaratory judgment action, appeals the trial court's March 14, 2001, order declaring that Minnesota owed a duty to defend and potentially indemnify Greenfield. We reverse.

¶ 2 Michael Greenfield…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mutual Benefit Insurance v. HaverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. ElitzkySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Stidham v. Millvale Sportsmen's ClubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Kraus v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Scopel v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API