Keystone State Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Ridley Park Borough
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 15, Oct. T., 1904, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Delaware Co., Dec. T., 1902, No. 242, dismissing the bill in case of The Keystone State Tele-, phone and Telegraph Company v. Ridley Park Borough, George C. Hetzel et al. Bill in equity for an injunction. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior C. >urt. Error assigned among others was in dismissing the bill.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rice, P. J.,
This is an appeal from a decree dismissing the plaintiff’s bill praying to have the borough and its officers restrained from cutting down, destroying or in any manner interfering with the plaintiff’s poles, wires or telephone system. The plaintiff was incorporated under the laws of the state of New Jersey and has complied with the laws of Pennsylvania relative to the registration of foreign corporations.
By ordinance approved September 30, 1901, the borough granted consent to the plaintiff to erect and maintain poles and wires within the limits of the borough, upon terms…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Philadelphia v. BarberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- Ferry v. CampbellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- Rung v. ShonebergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1833
- Allegheny v. Millville, Etna & Sharpsburg Street Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Searight's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Great American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Lenhart v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Northern Texas Utilities Co. v. Community Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Owl Protective Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Commonwealth v. DerhammerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.