Legal Opinion

In Re: Kimberly Emerson V.

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 7, 2011No. 11-8015Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

By order of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, the precedential effect of this decision is limited to the case and parties pursuant to 6th Cir. BAP LBR 8013-1(b). See also 6th Cir. BAP LBR 8010-1(c). File Name: 11b0007n.06 BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT In re: KIMBERLY C. EMERSON, ) ) Debtor. ) ______________________________________ ) ) THOMAS C. RICHARDSON, TRUSTEE, ) ) Plaintiff-Appellant, ) No. 11-8015 ) ) v. ) ) CITIMORTGAGE, INC., ) ) Defendant-Appellee. ) ) ______________________________________ ) Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. B.F. Goodrich Company v. United States Filter CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  3. In Re William M. Behlke and Dina E. Behlke, Debtors, William M. Behlke and Dina E. Behlke v. Saul Eisen, United States TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  4. Treinish v. Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. (In Re Periandri)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  5. Wells Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc. v. Chardon/Hato Rey Partnership, S.E.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API