Barnhart v. International Harvester Company

I am unable to agree with the majority opinion and therefore in dissenting I feel that the case is of sufficient importance that I should express my independent views in the matter.

In my opinion the result of the case should be based on the involved factual situations and in presenting my views it is necessary that the facts be more fully developed.

The two persons essential to the discussion herein, are the juror, Huffaker, and the claim adjuster, Salzman. Huffaker’s employment was that of a fire inspector and Salzman was a claim adjuster for the Employers Casualty Company, which company…