Legal Opinion

United States v. Ronald Arthur Ofshe

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided June 1, 1987No. 86-5351PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATKINS, Senior District Judge:

After entering a conditional plea of guilty, Ofshe appealed from an order denying his motion to dismiss the Indictment and an order denying his motion to suppress evidence. We find that (a) appellant’s constitutional rights were not violated by the government’s misconduct, and (b) the motion to suppress was properly denied. Thus, we AFFIRM.

I. STATEMENT OF FACTS

On or about December 2, 1982, Agent Stemaman, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), applied to the Honorable Norman Roettger for a warrant to search the premises at 2216 S.W. 60th Terrace, Mira-mar,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. United States v. John VoigtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. Terence George KellyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. Mervyn Harold Cross A/K/A Eric Cross, and Robert Carter LodgeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Edward CardonaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API