Legal Opinion

Darby v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1959No. Appeals, Nos. 266 and 267PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Watkins, J.,

This appeal concerns the scope of the certificate of the appellant, C. Y. Darby, trading as and doing business as Darby Transfer and-Storage, as construed by the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, in complaint proceedings instituted by Motor Freight Express, intervening appellee.

The question raised is whether the transportation of automobile body cleaners and Simoniz wax to the Automotive Supply Company, in the City of Altoona, Pennsylvania, the Superior Parts Service Company, in Altoona, Pennsylvania and to several food stores in Altoona and Huntingdon,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bird Trucking Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1955
  2. Scott Truck Line, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1958
  3. Weston Hauling, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Highway Express Lines, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mark-It Place Foods, Inc. v. New Plan Excel Realty Trust, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Commonwealth v. OwensSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. T. M. Zimmerman Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. State v. HarringtonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API