Estill v. Rodes

Judge Marshall

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

Estill, a judgment creditor of Rodes, having sued out execution on his judgment, on which the sheriff made a return of “no property found,” &c. filed this bill against Rodes, Miller, and Bronson, alleging that Rodes had paid to each of the other defendants large sumsmf money as usurious interest, upon moneys borrowed by him from them respectively, and prays that the money so paid for *315usury may be decreed to be paid to him in satisfaction of his judgment, to which, as he says, Rodes assents.

Rodes, however, in his answer admitting that he has…