Legal Opinion

Lindsay v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 1987No. 84-1027PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEADMAN, Associate Judge:

Obviously in error, a trial court judge entered an order which prematurely and unconditionally discharged appellant from probation imposed under the Federal Youth Corrections Act (“FYCA”). Under the FYCA, such an early unconditional discharge had the added effect of automatically setting aside the conviction. Realizing the mistake, the judge eight days later vacated the erroneous order. Appellant appeals on the ground that the vacation of the erroneous order, with the consequent reinstatement of the set aside conviction, violated appellant’s rights under the double…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Bozza v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. Anthony Maurice McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
  2. Veney v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. United States v. AllenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Barnes v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API