Legal Opinion

People v. Lobato

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 11, 2003No. F040408PublishedCited by 1 opinion

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GOMES, J,

Introduction

Defendant and appellant Rudy Ben Lobato appeals from a judgment following a jury trial in which he was convicted of conspiracy to commit certain drug offenses and a weight enhancement allegation was found to be true. In the published portion of the opinion, we reject appellant’s contention that the weight enhancement, which was imposed under Health and Safety Code section 11370.4, subdivision (b)(2), must be vacated because the jury’s verdict form did not expressly include the substantial involvement in the underlying offense element of the allegation. In the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. People v. SengpadychithCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. ChevalierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. Gallion CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API