Legal Opinion

Harold Pitts Roe v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 20, 1962No. 17120_1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The appeal taken by appellant from the denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255, for a vacation of his sentence will be permitted to be docketed without payment of fee, and it will thereupon be dismissed as being frivolous.

Appellant, with counsel appointed to represent him, was accorded a full hearing before the trial court upon the charges made in his motion that his pleas of guilty were obtained by coercion; that he was physically mistreated by the arresting officers, and was beaten, abused, threatened, and coerced by various jailers, United States Marshals, and FBI Agents; and that…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harold Pitts Roe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API