Legal Opinion

Large v. Passmore

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 9, 1819PublishedCited by 4 opinions

EXCEPTIONS to an award of referees.

1Opinion of the Court

The of the Court was delivered by

Tilghman C. J.

This case comes before us, on a rule to shew cause why two executions should not be set aside, and proceedings on the judgments staid, and issues directed order to ascertain the amount due to the plaintiff in each suit, On the 15th November, 1817, judgment was entered under *52warrant of attorney, against the two defendants, Passmore and Birckhead,, for the penalty of g 10,000, in a bond, conditioned for the payment of g 5,000, in a year from the date of dle bond, with lawful interest. And on the same day, judgment was entered against Thomas…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Horton v. Stanley, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1833
  2. Willing v. Baltimore Rail RoadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840
  3. Means v. Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1846
  4. McAdams' Executors v. StilwellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1850

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API