Legal Opinion

Weinbaum v. Algonquin Gas Transmission Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 10, 1955PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff appeals from an order insofar as it grants the motion of defendant Tulsa Williams Company to dismiss the amended complaint as to said defendant on the ground that said complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., MacCrate and Schmidt, JJ., concur; Wenzel and Beldock, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the order and to deny the motion to dismiss the amended complaint, with the following memorandum: On April 7, 1952, defendant Algonquin Gas Transmission…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Snyder Plumbing & Heating Corp. v. PurcellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  2. United States v. Ogden Technology Laboratories, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1973
  3. Resinol v. Valentine Dolls, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  4. Carlson v. Long Island RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API