Legal Opinion
United States v. Double Bend Mfg. Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 1, 1953PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff United States moves to dismiss a counterclaim in the defendant’s answer on. the grounds, first, that the court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the counterclaim, and second, that the counterclaim does not. comply with the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 2406.
The United States instituted this action to recover $4,069.80, the purchase price of goods alleged to have been sold to the defendant. The answer alleges, among other things, that the plaintiff breached the contract by shipping the goods to' New York and seeks by way of counterclaim damages in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. SilvertonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
- United States v. Nipissing Mines Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
- United States Ex Rel. Mutual Metal Mfg. Co. v. BiggsDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1942
- United States v. Capital Transit Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Wessel, Duval & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- United States v. KingDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1954
- United States v. FrankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- United States v. Ameco Electronic CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1963
- Kearney v. A'HearnDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.