Legal Opinion

People v. Camillo

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 22, 1988No. C001670PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SPARKS, J.

This case poses two questions about the welfare fraud statute. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 10980.) The first is whether obtaining more than $400 worth of welfare benefits by false representations for a number of consecutive months constitutes a single felony or only a series of misdemeanors. Welfare and Institutions Code section 10980, subdivision (c) provides that if the total amount of such aid is $400 or less, the crime is a misdemeanor and if more, an alternate felony. We hold that the crime is a felony when those benefits are illegally obtained pursuant to one general scheme.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
  4. People v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. People v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Susana Ferreira v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General Ronald J. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. People v. GLEECalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. People v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API