People v. Camillo
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPARKS, J.
This case poses two questions about the welfare fraud statute. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 10980.) The first is whether obtaining more than $400 worth of welfare benefits by false representations for a number of consecutive months constitutes a single felony or only a series of misdemeanors. Welfare and Institutions Code section 10980, subdivision (c) provides that if the total amount of such aid is $400 or less, the crime is a misdemeanor and if more, an alternate felony. We hold that the crime is a felony when those benefits are illegally obtained pursuant to one general scheme.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Susana Ferreira v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General Ronald J. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. GLEECalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- People v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.