Legal Opinion

Appeal of Old '76 Distilling Co.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided April 20, 1926No. Docket No. 1262PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1347OPINION.

Mokeis :

The question involved in this appeal is whether the taxpayer is entitled to deduct as a loss in the year 1917 the difference between the depreciated cost of certain tangible assets used in the manufacture of whisky and their salvage value. There is no question of obsolescence, as the revenue acts prior to that of 1918 did 'not provide for such a deduction. Section 12 (a) (2) of the Revenue Act of 1916 (unamended by the Revenue Act of 1917), provides for the deduction of “ all losses actually sustained and charged off within the year and not compensated by insurance or…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Buckeye Producing Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
  2. Fell v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1927
  3. Morand Bros. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1927
  4. Old '76 Distilling Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API