Legal Opinion

Higginbotham's Ex'x v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided December 15, 1874PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The case is stated in the opinion of the court delivered by Judge Bouldin.

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

This is a writ of error to a judgment of the Circuit court of the city of Richmond, dismissing with costs a petition of the plaintiff in error, filed in said court, to recover a debt alleged to be due to the petitioner from the State of Virginia.

The case was briefly this: — The plaintiff in error, and petitioner below, is executrix of David Higginbotham, deceased, who was owner of twelve shares of stock in the Old James River Company. By an amendment to the charter of that company, passed on the 17th day of February 1820, and duly accepted by the company, the companj--became the agent of the…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Dinwiddie County v. Stuart, Buchanan & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1877
  3. McCandlish v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1882
  4. Greenhow v. VashonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1886
  5. Parsons v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1885

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API