Little v. State

. SAMFORD, Judge.

The defendants were indicted by the grand jury and charged in two counts (1) with unlawfully possessing a still, etc., and (2) manufacturing whisky. They were each convicted under the first count, which acquits them under the second count and renders it unnecessary for us to pass on any questions relating to the charge under the second count.

In his oral charge to the jury the court said in part: “Now as to that feature of it (the possession of a part of a-still) a person who is found in the possession of a part of a still it is a presumption that he is in possession of the…