Legal Opinion

Reed v. Elmore

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 22, 1957No. 239Published

1Opinion of the Court

98 S.E.2d 360 (1957)

246 N.C. 221

C. S. REED

v.

H. H. ELMORE and wife, Bula T. Elmore.

No. 239.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 22, 1957.

Taliaferro, Grier, Parker & Poe, Charlotte, for plaintiff appellee.

Sedberry, Clayton & Sanders, Charlotte, and Gaston, Smith & Gaston, Belmont, for defendants appellants.

RODMAN, Justice.

The question presented for decision is: Do the provisions of the deed from Mrs. Shannon to plaintiff impose mutual restrictive servitudes on the lands then conveyed to plaintiff and retained by Mrs. Shannon, or did the deed merely create mutual personal obligations?

The answer…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Trustees of Columbia College v. . ThacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Adams v. RowlesTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Davis v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Hutchinson v. UlrichIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Turner v. . GlennSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API