Legal Opinion

Lytle v. Malady

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1997No. 102515, Calendar No. 16Published

1Opinion of the Court

566 N.W.2d 582 (1997)

Nancy LYTLE, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Michael MALADY and Howmet Corporation, Defendants-Appellants.

Docket No. 102515, Calendar No. 16.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Argued January 16, 1997.

Decided July 31, 1997.

Bott & Spencer, P.C. by Timothy J. Bott, Muskegon, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Varnum, Riddering, Schmidt & Howlett by Joseph J. Vogan and Paul M. Kara, Grand Rapids, for Defendants-Appellants.

Opinion

RILEY, Justice.

In the matter now before us, this Court is asked to clarify the evidentiary threshold a discharged employee must satisfy in order to create a genuine issue of…

2Cases cited72 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API