Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. Shulman

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided December 14, 2011No. MDL No. 2307PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING TRANSFER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the Panel: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, plaintiffs Irene and Isidoro Rodriguez have moved to centralize this litigation in the Western District of Washington or an “impartial panel” comprised of jurists outside the Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, and D.C. Circuits. Three groups of defendants oppose centralization:1

*1380After considering all arguments of counsel and the pro se litigants, we will deny the motion. Although these actions share some factual questions concerning, inter alia, the plaintiffs’ allegations of a wide-ranging conspiracy…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Transocean Ltd. Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2010
  2. In Re Glenn W. Turner Enterprises LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1973

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re KissiUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2013
  2. In re Thomas E. Noble LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2016
  3. In re: Roundup Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API