Legal Opinion

Great Western Sugar Company v. Erbes

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 18, 1961No. 19693PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Pringle.

Plaintiffs in error were defendants in the trial court and defendant in error was the plaintiff. We will refer to them as they there appeared or by name.

The plaintiff Erbes was an employee of M. & A. Enterprises. Prior to June 4, 1957, the date on which Erbes was injured, M. & A. had contracted with the defendant Sugar Company to construct some sugar bins on the latter’s property. The contract by its terms required M. & A. to carry Workmen’s Compensation insurance for its employees. M. & A. carried Erbes on its payroll as an employee and covered him in its…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Merlo v. Public Service Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Chartier v. Winslow Crane Service CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  3. Schulte v. American Box Board Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Clark v. Monarch Engineering Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Miller ex rel. Miller v. J. A. Utley Construction Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1957

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Travelers Insurance Co. v. SavioSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  2. Frohlick Crane Service, Inc. v. MacKSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  3. Robinett v. the Haskell Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  4. Alexander v. Morrison-Knudsen CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  5. DiNicola v. George Hyman Construction Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API