Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Johnson v. Omondi

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 14, 2013No. S13G0553Published

1ConcurrenceBlackwell, Justice

I concur fully in the opinion of the Court. I write separately, however, to more fully explain my understanding of “gross negligence,” as that standard is applied in medical malpractice cases. I also write separately to share some additional thoughts about summary judgments in cases in which OCGA § 51-1-29.5 applies.

1. “Gross negligence” is a familiar standard in our law, see Peavy v. Peavy, 36 Ga. App. 202, 204 (2) (136 SE 96) (1926), but it is one that has proven difficult to define with precision. According to our Code, “gross negligence” is “[t]he absence of [slight diligence],” and…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Browne v. RobbSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
  2. Albright v. Abington Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Pilgrim v. LandhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  4. Albanna v. State Board of Registration for the Healing ArtsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  5. Atlanta Oculoplastic Surgery, P.C. v. NestlehuttSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API