Legal Opinion

Turnbull v. Strohecker

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided April 15, 1827Published

1Opinion of the Court

All objections and pleadings in reply to a discount are ore tenus, and require no previous notice; and a discount barred by the statute of limitations is inadmissable if objected to. Buller N. P. 180. Mont. on Set Off, 20. Peake’s N. P. Cases, 121. Tidd’sPrac. 604. 17 John. Rep. 330.

*211Where plaintiff sues on an account made up of various items, some of them within four years, and the others of longer date, the items charged within four years will not prevent the statute of limitations from running against the other items, where they are only demands by A. against B. in the common way of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Martin v. WilliamsNew York Supreme Court · 1820

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API