Phillips v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appeal is taken from a conviction for burglary of a building. Punishment, enhanced by two prior felony convictions, was assessed at life. The Court of Appeals affirmed Appellant’s conviction. Phillips v. State, 639 S.W.2d 501 (Tex.App.—Ft. Worth, 1982). No motion for rehearing was filed.
In his petition 'for discretionary review, Appellant urges that the Court erred in failing to grant his motion to set aside the indictment on the basis of a violation of the Speedy Trial Act. Art. 32A.02, V.A.C.C.P. In rejecting this contention, the Court of Appeals stated in part:
“... delay in trial…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Barfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Hathorne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
- Komurke v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Ostoja v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by13 opinions
- Philen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Koffel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Myers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Carter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.