Legal Opinion

Chick v. Fuller

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 21, 1902No. 682PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the Northern District of Illinois. The bill was by appellants, judgment creditors of the Northwestern Shoe Company, and in behalf of all other creditors of that company who might join in the suit against the appellees, (a) to set aside certain alleged preferences said to have been made by the directors and officers of the Shoe Company to the appellees, Allen C. Fuller, the First National Bank of…

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the Northern District of Illinois. The bill was by appellants, judgment creditors of the Northwestern Shoe Company, and in behalf of all other creditors of that company who might join in the suit against the appellees, (a) to set aside certain alleged preferences said to have been made by the directors and officers of the Shoe Company to the appellees, Allen C. Fuller, the First National Bank of Belvi-dere and the Second National Bank of Belvidere; (b) to hold the directors and officers (Allen C. Fuller, John J.…

1Opinion of the Court

After the foregoing statement, the opinion of the court was delivered by

GROSSCUP, Circuit Judge.

The facts rightly settled, this case involves no controverted questions of law. The evidentiary facts are voluminous, but the findings upon which the case turns, including what seems necessarily prefatory, may be summed up as. follows:

In 1890 the Northwestern Shoe Company of Chicago entered into negotiations with-certain citizens of Beividere, Illinois,, looking toward the transfer of the shoe company from Chicago to Beividere. As a result of these negotiations, a public meeting was held in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hollins v. Brierfield Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Richardson's v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Sanford Fork & Tool Co. v. Howe Brown & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Sutton Manuf'g Co. v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894
  5. Blair v. Illinois Steel Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sweet v. Montpelier Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. Southern California Home Builders v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. E. L. Moore & Co. v. MurchisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API