Federal Trade Commission v. National Business Consultants, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge:
Defendants-Appellants appeal from the district court’s Amended Judgment of April 8, 2003 that amended a 1991 Judgment in favor of Plaintiff-Appellee Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) against Defendants-Appellants National Business Consultants, Inc. (“NBC”) and Robert Namer. The Amended Judgment added: (1) Nam-er, Inc.; (2) America First Communications, Inc.; (3) Voice of America, Inc.; and (4) Friends of Robert Namer (collectively, the “Additional Parties”) as additional defendants and judgment debtors. Finding no error, we affirm. 1
I. BACKGROUND
In 1989, the FTC sued…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Dino Cinel v. Harry F. Connick, Individually and as District Attorney for the Parish of Orleans, State of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Alvarez-SanchezSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Frank P. Bongiorno, United States of America v. Frank P. BongiornoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. James Scott Mann William M. Moore, Defendants-Appellants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Carnegie Technologies. v. TrillerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
- Chartis Specialty Insurance v. Tesoro Corp.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2013
- Occidental Petroleum v. Wells FargoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024
- Rubin v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- Federal Trade Commission v. NamerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.