Legal Opinion
(PS) Schmitz v. Asman
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 16, 2023No. 2:20-cv-00195Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THOMAS SCHMITZ, et al., No. 2:20-cv-00195-DAD-CKD PS 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER 14 ADAM ASMAN, et al., (ECF No. 238) 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiffs1 have moved to strike the answer filed by defendants Adams, Andaluz, Ashe, 19 Asman, Branman, Brizendine, Brockenborough, Ceballos, Diaz, Gibson, Heatley, J. Johnson, R. 20 Johnson, Kernan, Leidner, Ponciano, Ramkumar, Rekart, Robinson, Rudas, M. Smith, C. Smith, 21 Tebrock, Toche, and Wainie. The court previously took the motion under submission…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Whittlestone, Inc. v. Handi-Craft Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Fantasy, Inc. v. FogertyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Sidney-Vinstein v. A.H. Robins Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Stanbury Law Firm, P.A. v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.