Legal Opinion

People v. Coleman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 1972PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum.

Although the scope of appeal in a criminal case after a guilty plea is narrowly limited, one of the questions reviewable by an Appellate Division is the severity of sentence. "Where the defendant is still actually serving under a sentence claimed to be excessive, he may raise that question on appeal. Within People v. Lynn (28 N Y 2d 196 [1971]) this, would be regarded as a “ viable claim ” in an application pursuant to People v. Montgomery (24 N Y 2d 130) to reimpose judgment to revive the right to appeal.

Appellant here is presently serving under the maximum sentence imposed. Upon…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. ThompsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. CorsoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. People v. EspinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API