F.C.C., Inc. v. Reuter
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FLAHERTY, Justice.
In this appeal we are called upon to determine the constitutionality of G.L. 1956 chapter 28 of title 34, the so called mechanics’ lien statute. Our decision in this controversy comes on the heels of our holding in Gem Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Rossi, 867 A.2d 796 (R.I.2005) in which we declared the mechanics’ hen statute to be constitutional, particularly as amended on July 17, 2003, (P.L. 2003, ch. 269, §§ 1, 2), and codified at § 34-28-17.1. 1 In this case, the plaintiff contractor, F.C.C., Inc. (F.C.C.), appeals from a Superior Court decision granting summary…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gem Plumbing & Heating Co., Inc. v. RossiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
- Woodland Manor III Associates v. KeeneySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
- O'REILLY v. Town of GlocesterSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993
- RHODE ISLAND INSURERS'INSOLVENCY FUND v. Leviton Manufacturing Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
- Solas v. Emergency Hiring CouncilSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- DeSimone Electric, Inc. v. CMG, INC.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006