Legal Opinion

People v. Herr

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1993PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*307OPINION OF THE COURT

Mario J. Rossetti, J.

The defendant has moved pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate his judgment entered on September 8, 1992 on the grounds that it was obtained in violation of his right to counsel as guaranteed under the Federal and State Constitutions. The gravamen of defendant’s contention is that, since his trial attorney was throughout the proceeding also the Village Prosecutor for the Village of Blasdell, his right to counsel was violated pursuant to People v Shinkle (51 NY2d 417), People v Cooper (156 Misc 2d 483) and the New York State Bar Association Committee on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Niesig v. Team INew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. People v. ShinkleNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. In re HofAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. People v. EarlyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. Moxham v. HanninganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. HerrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API