Legal Opinion

Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Danell A. Huthsing

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 7, 2015No. 15-0378PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

On appeal is a final order dismissing appellant’s amended complaint for a deficiency judgment. The trial court concluded it lacked personal jurisdiction over ap-pellee, a non-resident. Our review of the trial court’s order is de novo. Wendt v. Horowitz, 822 So.2d 1252, 1256 (Fla.2002).

Applying the principles discussed by the Florida Supreme Court in Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais, 554 So.2d 499 (Fla.1989), the well-pleaded allegations of the amended complaint (which went undisputed by appellee’s affidavit attached to her motion to dismiss) were sufficient to bring the action within the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Venetian Salami Co. v. ParthenaisSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  3. Wendt v. HorowitzSupreme Court of Florida · 2002

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aluia v. Dyck-O'Neal, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  2. Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. RojasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  3. Sylvia Higgins and Collier Higgins v. Dyck O'Neal, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  4. Sylvia Higgins and Collier Higgins v. Dyck O'Neal, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API