Legal Opinion

De Foe v. Board of Election Commissioners

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1913No. Calendar No. 25,625PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Mandamus by Fred W. De Foe against Horace Tupper and others, as the board of election commissioners for the city of Bay City, to compel respondents to print the name of relator as candidate for mayor of the National Progressive party on the official ballot.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

The petition in this case prays for a mandamus to compel the board of election commissioners of Bay City to cause the name of relator to be printed on the ballot labels for use on the voting machines at the April election in said city as the candidate of the National Progressive party for the office of mayor of said city. The facts are not in dispute, and are as follows:

Relator is a resident and elector of said city, and has been actively identified with the National Progressive party since its organization, but prior to February 12,1913, had been enrolled as a member of the Republican party.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cook v. Board of Election CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Loranger v. NavarreMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brown v. Board of Election CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API