Legal Opinion

Raleigh Real Estate Co. v. Moser

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 27, 1918PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Civil ACTION, tried before Bovin, J., at June Term, 1917, of Wake. There was a verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBkowN, J.

This action is brought to recover of defendant $150, commissions alleged to be due plaintiff upon a real estate transaction. The evidence shows that the defendant owned a house and lot on Polk Street, in the city of Ealeigh, and that T. W. Fenner owned lot No. 6 in Cameron Park, a suburb. The defendant had placed his house with plaintiff for sale at $3,500, the plaintiff to have 5 per cent commission for selling. The evidence shows that plaintiff had been negotiating with Fenner for a trade, and that Fenner had stated he would pay $1,350 “boot,” together with $150, plaintiff’s commission.. It…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jarrett v. High Point Trunk & Bag Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. Raleigh Real Estate & Trust Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. Morton v. Blades Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. . O'NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. State v. . MeltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. State v. . BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Butler v. Holt-Williamson Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  5. Yellow Cab Co. of Charlotte, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API