Legal Opinion
Russell v. Deadwood Development Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided May 8, 1903PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from the circuit court, Lawrence county, Hon. Joseph B. Moore, Judge. Action by Michael R. Russell and others against the Deadwood Development Company and others. Prom a judgment for defendants, plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtPuller, J.
Although this case was placed upon the April, 1902, calendar, and assigned for argument at that term, no abstracts or briefs have ever been filed. According to the settled practice of this court, it is presumed that there are no questions upon which a decision is desired. Benedict v. Smith 10 S. D. 35, 71 N. W. 139; Giles et al. v. Hawkeye Gold Mining Co. et al., 11 S. D. 222, 76 N. W. 928. In the absence of anything within our reach pertaining to the merits, the appeal is dismissed.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Benedict v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by3 opinions
- W. T. Rawleigh Medical Co. v. LaursenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Welch v. SynogroundSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
- Dakota National Bank v. Klein-SchmidtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913