Legal Opinion
Sarro v. Astrue
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 21, 2010No. 07-CV-1589 (NGG)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Albert Sarro (“Plaintiff’) filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to review the determination of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant” or “Commissioner”) that he was not entitled to disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. {See Compl. (Docket Entry # 1).) The parties filed cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings. (Docket Entry # 16.) Subsequently, the Commissioner withdrew his motion (Docket Entry # 19) and instead filed a motion for remand for further administrative proceedings…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- William J. Kerin, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. United States Postal Service, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Annie HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, M.D., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Healey v. LeavittCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Sergenton v. AstrueDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
3Cited by5 opinions
- Barbour v. ColvinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Berry v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022
- Diberardino v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020
- Ortiz v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Rosario v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022