Legal Opinion
Romero-Flores v. Barr
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 13, 2020No. 17-2263Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
17-2263 Romero-Flores v. Barr BIA Christensen, IJ A206 688 042/043 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Marta Brigida Melgar De Torres v. Janet Reno, Attorney General, and the Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Ucelo-Gomez v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Buffonge v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Acharya v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.