Legal Opinion

The Hazel E. Herman

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 13, 1928No. 5108PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

This case comes up on a writ of error, which we will *28treat as an appeal. The record supports the following conclusions as to the undisputed material facts:

The British schooner Hazel E. Herman, with a cargo of intoxicating liquor on board, was attacked by “highjackers” on the high seas on August 9,1926, about 8 o’clock in the morning. The “highjackers” were repulsed, but the master and cook were seriously wounded. Thereafter the schooner hoisted a distress signal and proceeded in the direction of St. Augustine, Ela., and somewhere off the coast transferred the wounded…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. SheaSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. The Hazel E. HermanDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Eskine v. United Barge Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. Eskine v. United Barge CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  3. Mohamed v. DillardDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
  4. Tatpa v. JaddouDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API