Legal Opinion

Gruwell v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 2011No. S-10-0168PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURKE, Justice.

[T1] Appellant, Jay Allen Gruwell, challenges his conviction on one count of sexual abuse of a minor in the third degree, in violation of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 1 He contends the district court erred in excluding the testimony of one proposed expert witness and limiting the testimony of another expert witness. He also argues that the district court erred in determining that the child victim was competent to testify at trial. We affirm.

ISSUES

[12] Appellant presents the following issues:

1. Did the district court abuse its discretion in excluding Appellant's expert witness, Dr.…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Kentucky v. StincerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. State v. HansenOregon Supreme Court · 1987

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Byron Nelson Griggs v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Mersereau v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Dharminder Vir Sen v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Travis J. Kovach v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Benjamin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API