Legal Opinion

Goodwin v. Kumm

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 5, 1890PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment of the district court for Fillmore county, where the action was tried by Farmer, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This was an action for the partition of certain lands of which plaintiffs allege they are the owners of one undivided third, and the defendants of the other undivided two-thirds. The agreed facts are that in April, 1878, one John R. McKisson, being then the owner of the land in question, conveyed it, with full covenants of warranty, for a consideration greater than its present value, to defendants’ grantor, his wife, An,nie Mary McKisson, not joining in the deed, and never having in any manner assented thereto in writing. John R. McKisson died intestate in February, 1885, and his wife, also…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Russ v. AlpaughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dayton v. CorserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. Griswold v. McGeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  3. Johnson v. Minnesota Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  4. Woll v. VoigtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  5. Merrill v. Security Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API