Mancine v. Concord-Liberty Savings & Loan Ass'n
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1ConcurrencePrice, Judge
Although I concur in the majority’s conclusion that Section 9 of the Act of 1705 was erroneously applied, I do so for reasons other than those found controlling by the majority. I would also hold that, while appellant did not err in bringing a cause of action in assumpsit, the cause of action cannot properly be predicated on a breach of contract theory-
Appellant’s mother, Rose Startari, owned certain real estate at 5000 Ladora Street until her death on October 13, 1966. On May 7, 1956, she executed a mortgage on the real estate to secure a loan of $3,600.00 from Hibernian Savings and Loan…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. PorterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Federal Land Bank of Balto. v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Lanning v. PawsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861
- Wilson v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1852
- Gibson v. WinslowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.