Legal Opinion
Monteiro v. Paco Tankers, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 22, 1950No. Civ. No. 9401PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLLMER, District Judge.
In this action the plaintiff, Monteiro, had been employed as a messman on board the Steamship “Kittanning”, which was ■owned by the defendant, Paco. A dispute arose regarding overtime claimed by plaintiff for services performed during the voyage. The overtime services , consisted in the squeezing of orange juice for the captain and the amount of. overtime wágés ■claimed was $15.
There was testimony from which the jury could find, and in the light of the verdict, I must assume did find the facts as hereinafter stated.
The steward, Demas, and the captain, Miller, had…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. PrenticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- The IroquoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Nowery v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
- T. J. Moss Tie Co. v. TannerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1930
3Cited by7 opinions
- Paul v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Sullivan v. MattCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Elsie C. Wiper, of the Estate of Joseph W. Wiper, Deceased v. Erie Sand Steamship Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Paul v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
- Paul v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.