Legal Opinion

PHILLIPS v. JACKSON, JUDGE

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 9, 2022No. S22A0503PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

314 Ga. 347

FINAL COPY S22A0503. PHILLIPS v. JACKSON et al. PETERSON, Presiding Justice. A judge of the Municipal Court of Atlanta believed that Carey Phillips’s traffic citation gave rise to “quasi-bond” conditions that it could — and did — modify in order to restrict Phillips’s driving privileges. Phillips disagreed, but instead of appealing the municipal court judge’s order, he sought pretrial habeas relief against the municipal court judge and the City of Atlanta Solicitor. Counsel for the respondents did not attempt to defend the judge’s order on the merits, arguing only that Phillips’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  2. Wickham v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  3. Single Manufacturing Co. v. McNeal Paint & Glass Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Kearse v. PaulkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  5. Hayes v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. GAY v. JACKSON, JUDGESupreme Court of Georgia · 2023
  2. Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API