Legal Opinion · Dissent

Grand Sport Auto Body v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 24, 2012Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

President Judge PELLEGRINI.

Because the Board found good cause for Claimant’s last absence, and Claimant would not have been terminated but for that final absence, I respectfully dissent from the majority and would affirm the Board.

Claimant would never receive an award for being a punctual employee. In fact, Claimant had been terminated on December 28, 2007, as a result of absenteeism and tardiness, but Employer rehired him on January 25, 2008, on the condition that he sign an Employment Agreement acknowledging his attendance problems. Claimant requested time off from…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Guthrie v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Fritz v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Unempoyment Compensation Board of Review v. GlennCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Runkle v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Adept Corp. v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API