Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brown v. Garey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 8, 1934Published

1DissentUntermyer, J.

The defendants were discharged from the liability asserted in the complaint unless the conversion of the plaintiff’s shares of stock was “ willful and malicious.” (Bankruptcy Act, § 17, subd. 2; U. S. Code, tit. 11, § 35, subd. 2.) The burden of establishing that it was willful and malicious rather than accidental or negligent was upon the plaintiff who asserted that the liability was excluded from the operation of the discharge. (Kreitlein v. Ferger, 238 U. S. 21; Matter of Levitan, 224 Fed. 241; *373Manheim v. Loewe, 185 App. Div. 601; Niles v. Havens, 198 id. 546.) Not only does it seem to me…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McIntyre v. KavanaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Kreitlein v. FergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Wood v. . FiskNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. In re LevitanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1915
  5. Manheim v. LoeweAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API